On Jul 7, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > And what does it mean to "base it on CMS"? > > It could, for example, mean that > 1) the same functionality as CMS has to be provided (but with a JSON encoding) > 2) folks should look at CMS to get inspired > 3) for a chosen subset of CMS that the JSON-based realization must be > semantically equivalent (for example, to make translation easy or so) > 4) re-use of parts is encouraged (such as registries, etc.) > > What did you had in mind, Paul?
I was reflecting an earlier message from our AD. On Jun 14, 2011, at 9:31 AM, Sean Turner wrote: > In Prague, I thought the goal was pretty straightforward: JSONize CMS. That seems clear to me. It's closer to your #1 above, but the rest of the proposed charter makes it clear that it is a subset of CMS, namely signing and encrypting. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ woes mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes
