On Jul 25, 2011, at 13:16, Leif Johansson wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 07/25/2011 06:59 PM, Paul C. Bryan wrote: >> I now find myself hoping this is not the beginning someone making a case >> for ASN.1 encoding in WOES. >> >> For my edification, can someone comment on how CMS would likely be >> referenced in WOES? Would it likely be a normative reference (i.e. key >> transport/wrapping, as it is in xmlenc-core), or otherwise would it >> probably be just informational? > > We seem to be bike-shedding on the words "based on" in the charter. > Perhaps it helps if we say something to the effect that WOES draws > upon experience from CMS and XML-dsig/enc and leave it at that. >
+1 - m&m Matt Miller - <[email protected]> Collaboration Software Group - Cisco Systems, Inc.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ woes mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes
