Hmm, reading through all the documentation we're pretty well covered for the contents of release notes. Do we need a document explicitly called RELEASE_NOTES?
On 17 Dec 2010, at 09:00, Kris Popat wrote: > > > On 17 Dec 2010, at 07:48, Scott Wilson wrote: > >> OK, we got a release branch! >> >> So what's next? I think the documentation looks OK. > > I'm just working on the release notes and signing the binaries. I'll put up > the release notes today so others can check and amend as necessary. > >> >> How are we actually releasing it in terms of binaries for download? > > > For release the source package will need to be compressed both as .tar.gz and > .zip. > > Do we want a binary release as well? > > We'll also need to test that I've signed the binaries correctly. >> >
