On 17 Dec 2010, at 10:56, Scott Wilson wrote: > > On 17 Dec 2010, at 09:00, Kris Popat wrote: > >> >> >> On 17 Dec 2010, at 07:48, Scott Wilson wrote: >> >>> OK, we got a release branch! >>> >>> So what's next? I think the documentation looks OK. >> >> I'm just working on the release notes and signing the binaries. I'll put up >> the release notes today so others can check and amend as necessary. >> >>> >>> How are we actually releasing it in terms of binaries for download? >> >> >> For release the source package will need to be compressed both as .tar.gz >> and .zip. >> >> Do we want a binary release as well? >> > > I think it would require a bit more thought and lots more testing - how about > we stick to source packages for 0.9.0 and think about how we'd create a > binary distrib for future releases? > >> We'll also need to test that I've signed the binaries correctly. > > Yep
If we are only doing a source release, what binaries need signing?
