On 12 Jan 2011, at 10:31, Kris Popat wrote:

> Hi All
> 
> On 12 Jan 2011, at 09:12, Scott Wilson wrote:
>> 
>> On 17 Dec 2010, at 16:08, Ross Gardler wrote:
>> 
>>> On 17/12/2010 15:48, Scott Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 17 Dec 2010, at 15:17, Kris Popat wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 17 Dec 2010, at 14:50, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 17/12/2010 14:32, Kris Popat wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Lets go with Scotts suggestion to distribute a WAR alongside a
>>>>>> binary. The standalone version is only to make it easy for
>>>>>> developers so there is no need to worry about a binary of that.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Okay I'll create and test a war with Tomcat, what other application
>>>>> servers should we test against?
>>>> 
>>>> I think just testing against a couple of versions of Tomcat (6, 7)
>>>> should be enough for now, we can always put a note with the WAR to
>>>> that effect.
> 
> I have come up against a persistence issue with the WAR file.  This can be 
> made to work under tomcat using mysql.  As I understand it having a 
> dependency on mysql is a licensing problem. I'm just working out how that 
> dependency can be unpicked.  However if anyone knows how this can be done (or 
> if there is a simple way to build the WAR file so it will work with derby out 
> of the box) just to save me going round the houses that would be great.

That is so annoying. I guess we haven't really tested it much using 
Tomcat+Derby. 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to