Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity. On Nov 4, 2011 10:15 PM, "Ate Douma" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 11/04/2011 06:32 PM, sebb wrote: >> >>
... >>> Result: >>> http://incubator.markmail.org/search/?q=wookie-dev#query:wookie-dev%20date%3A201111%20+page:1+mid:xpzregppdevaipca+state:results >>> >>> Svn source tag: >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wookie/tags/0.9.1-incubating/ >> >> >> -1 >> >> The LICENSE file looks incomplete - it should contain copies of all >> the 3rd party licenses, not just URLs (although those are useful). >> ... > > I failed as a mentor here. Ditto. Although I thought this was acceptable. I know of a number of projects which do this. > I'm puzzled though how this regression happened. The 0.9.0 release did have all 3rd party license texts copied. Anyone can shed a light on why? This, and other regressions, puzzle me too. they imply that the changes in the release branch were not merged into trunk. > Just as an addition point of information, not as an intended point of action: > For the ASF a release vote requires only 3x +1 votes. For a PPMC this means it requires 3x +1 from IPMC members. > > However, *releases may not be vetoed* ... [1] > > If a 3x +1 is received, it is the responsibility of the Release Manager to decide if the release is accepted. And can do so, even with a number of -1 votes... Important clarification. > I'm not suggesting to ignore the -1 from sebb, as I think he does have a valid point, and normally that should be enough to pull back a vote. > But formally this -1 vote is not a veto. > > Regards, > > Ate > > [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > section "Votes on Package Releases" > > > > >>> Release notes: >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wookie/tags/0.9.1-incubating/RELEASE_NOTES >>> >>> Release artifacts: >>> http://people.apache.org/~psharples/wookie/staging-area/0p9p1/rc4/ >>> >>> PGP release keys: >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wookie/KEYS >>> >>> Vote open for 72 hours. >>> >>> [ ] +1 approve >>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >
