On 5 Nov 2011, at 10:51, Ate Douma wrote: > On Nov 5, 2011 11:29 AM, "Scott Wilson" <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> So is the omission that: >> >> 1. a copy of the BSD and MIT licenses must also be transcluded >> > > This. AFAIK the 0.9.0 release did this already correct.
OK just to be 100% clear... We need a generic copy of the BSD license text, and a generic copy of the MIT license text? Just thinking these will not then include the copyright notice of the specific code being reused. Or is that covered by the link to the original project? I'm happy to sort this out - I think Paul needs a break :-) (Also: Is the "licenses" folder in trunk obsolete?)
