On 02/10/2012 01:18 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
On 02/10/2012 11:04 AM, Paul Sharples wrote:
On 09/02/2012 11:51, Ate Douma wrote:
I'm trying to review the current wookie trunk on LICENSE and NOTICE
requirements for the next release.
All Jira issues are now dealt with and the Rat report now looks ok.
Do we need more time for reviewing or are we ready to cut a release?
It also seems to me WOOKIE-314 should be fixed, right?
Note that it doesn't have its Fix Version set, which makes it not show up on the
issues for 0.9.2
I'd like to give it one more thorough review, which I'll try to finish before
end of this working day.
Ate
p.s. I suggest someone adds the /release folder to svn:ignore.
It now shows up as a svn modification.
Paul
First question I have is: how do I 'build' a release binary?
From ant -p I don't see a build target which should do that.
To be able to properly review what will end up in the binary release, I need
to be able to build that myself, or have to wait until a candidate is prepared
by others. I'd like to do it myself :)
It would also be nice if a release-management kind of documentation could be
published on the website, kind of similar to what we have for Rave [1].
As a start I looked briefly at the root NOTICE file which raises a few
suggestions and questions already:
- Bubbles.wgt notice
I looked the provided url up but couldn't find any license or notice
whatsoever for inclusion/usage of this widget, and neither does the .wgt has
anything embedded. Where did this *required* notice come from (note: only
*required* notices should be added to the NOTICE file)
- many/most of the other notices seems to be for MIT/BSD licensed stuff
Those should not need notices, unless (extra) explicitly required and/or
coming with a NOTICE (file) of their own. In general, if for these products
their license (with copyright statement) is included in our LICENSE file,
there is no need to also add a notice in the NOTICE file. AFAIK the /LICENSE
file already takes care of that properly, +1 on that.
In general, the NOTICE file should not be used for providing friendly credits.
This file has a legal purpose only.
If we want to give friendly but non-required credits, the README file
can/should be used for that instead.
Anything we add to our NOTICE (required or not) we force upon our downstream
users to keep as specified by our AS 2.0 license section 4d.
This is why more recently there is more attention for making sure we only put
really required entries in the NOTICE file, to lessen the burden for our
downstream users.
Ate
