Well what would you like to do? we could delete it?!
On 17 Oct 2009, at 19:44, Andrea Rennick wrote:
Tom Lynch wrote:
I don't know about what they will be confused by because I don't
understand what your saying its like your only saying half the
sentence I don't understand what you mean?
:D
On this page: http://codex.wordpress.org/Category:WPMU_Functions
read the 4th paragraph. Also, this ties in to the following, from a
previous series of emails:
>> I notice also you created the WPMU Functions category which is
>> basically just the same as the WPMU Functions page. While I
>> appreciate it's helpful to have them all in one place, I'm not
keen on
>> the near exact replication of the two (and, to be honest, in my
>> opinion there aren't enough MU pages to make the main category so
>> mind-bogglingly complex that the new category is strictly
required).
>> Looking at the main WP function reference /page/ the added value of
>> that page (over the Functions /category/) is that it groups the
>> functions further and adds more narrative. Did you have plans
along
>> those lines for the WPMU Functions page? I'd be interested to hear
>> other people's opinions on that -- perhaps I'm just too used to the
>> way things are now to see the benefit here :)
>
> I implemented this because the /Functions for WP has this same
> duplication and I wanted to see if it was useful to others. If not
feel
> free to delete or what ever as I am not keen on it after sleeping
on it
> over night.
>
make more sense now?
A.
_______________________________________________
wp-docs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs
Kind Regards
Tom Lynch
++++++++++++++++++++++++
T: +44 (0)7786 540 167
E: [email protected]
++++++++++++++++++++++++
_______________________________________________
wp-docs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs
