This sounds reasonable. I think deleting the page may be easiest.
Kind Regards Tom Lynch ++++++++++++++++++++++++ T: +44 (0)7786 540 167 E: [email protected] tomlynch.co.uk ++++++++++++++++++++++++ On 18 Oct 2009, at 01:56, Carreg <[email protected]> wrote: > Tom Lynch wrote: >> Well what would you like to do? we could delete it?! > Do you mean the page, the category or the link? > > Cards on the table: I don't like the category much. I think it's > superfluous to requirements given we have the page. However if we > do keep it then we do need to link from one to the other. Perhaps > in that case it would help to change the paragraphs at the top of > one or other to at least prevent the confusion of it looking like > it's the same page. > > Perhaps we should rename the "WPMU Functions" to "WPMU Function > Reference" and give it an overhaul to be more like the main function > reference with a wider scope. It could then also include links to > documentation on MU's additional classes as well as the functions. > > Other than that I agree with Andrea -- it's looking good! I notice > there are a few functions missing from the list still (such as the > excellent is_user_spammy), so now most of the stuff that was there > is now documented it's probably worth going through and adding all > the missing functions and documenting those. It doesn't seem like > the function list has been updated for a good while and with that in > mind it also strikes me that it might be worth adding some version > information to each function so people aren't looking for things > which don't exist for their particular install. > > C. > _______________________________________________ > wp-docs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs _______________________________________________ wp-docs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs
