Yeah, I know. Thanks for the reminder (and publicity, for everyones benefit). If I didn't *have to publish it under GPL, it would be fine to copy.*
**P.S. I don't mind the license much, don't get me wrong, but I *do* like discussing stuff and getting input. On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:31 AM, mrmist <[email protected]> wrote: > In message <[email protected]>, > Arlen Beiler <[email protected]> writes > > That is what I am doing. Dougal described it exactly. If you still don't >> get it, >> think of it this way. I am separately publishing whatever I contribute as >> GPL and also as CC-By-SA. Meaning that if you want to use it on a GPL >> licensed site, you can; as well as on a CC-By-SA licensed site. >> >> > Which I guess is fine, for stuff that you create. But you can't, say, take > something that is already published under one licence, change it, and then > place that something somewhere where it would be under another, incompatible > licence. So it doesn't really help you when it comes to taking wikipedia > stuff and putting it onto the Codex. > > > -- > mrmist > > _______________________________________________ > wp-docs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs >
_______________________________________________ wp-docs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs
