What about a creative commons license for the docs? http://creativecommons.org/licenses/
Some people may be shying away from using it without any posted license is all. A. On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Matt Mullenweg <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8/16/2011 4:09 AM, Otto wrote: > >> I would guess no, because the GPL isn't suitable for documentation for >> various reasons. >> >> However, I do not know for sure what license it is available under. >> > > Historically we've said Codex + WP.org documentation is available under GPL > even though it's not well-suited for content because the GFDL is > incompatible with the GPL, so for embedding documentation in code and such > it's easier for them just to be "the same thing." > > As for Learn, it's a WP.com-specific thing but the content and images are > available under GPL or whatever license you guys would like if you'd like to > adapt it for .org, it's meant to be shared. :) > > -- > Matt Mullenweg > http://ma.tt | http://wordpress.org | http://automattic.com > ______________________________**_________________ > wp-docs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.automattic.com/**mailman/listinfo/wp-docs<http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs> > -- -- Andrea Rennick, http://wpebooks.com and http://ronandandrea.com Co-author of WordPress All-In-One For Dummies http://rml.me/aio
_______________________________________________ wp-docs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs
