On 03/12/05, Andy Staines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (A) I don't want my folder structure imposed on me like this - I want > choice
Most people won't be bothered about this, so the option has been moved to the actual code rather than cluttering the admin interface, as westi pointed out. > (B) I want the choice as to whether I want thumbnails or not - and I > don't Yes, you do. Click on a photo and then 'Use Original'. > (C) If I don't use rich text editing then dragging an image into the > post area does not give me HTML tags That's a bug then. > (D) In Safari/Omniweb I can't change the options on the uploaded image You couldn't do that before either. And it's not our fault. > (E) If I CAN change the options I want to use a class from my CSS for > formatting so still have to manually edit ...which you had to do before anyway... > (F) If I accept the OTT folder structure then how are tools like Ecto > going to work that currently look for a single image location? Hmm... good question. I can't see any immediate solutions to this, but what comes to mind: * Have a flat folder structure. Disadvantage is that some filesystems get really cranky when a lot of small files build up in one directory. * Have some kind of symlink, 'wp-content/uploads/current' or something, that links to the current month's folder. Windows implementation would be tricky. * Have a wp-content/uploads/current folder which is attached to the current month. When the first upload is made in the next month, all the current files in this folder are moved to the year/month folder structure. Complex, unreliable and a permissions nightmare. Oh, and it'd break permalinks. -- -David House, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://xmouse.ithium.net _______________________________________________ wp-testers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
