On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:53:16 -0700, "Lloyd D Budd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm wrong if I say this is only a partial replacement and not a really >> alternative solution? > >The version in developer (2.1) is just that, in developer. If this >functionality is a priority, then this is an opportunity to >demonstrate that by contributing. Having duplicate functionality is >not good for developing (maintenance) or for the user experience. 1) I would be happy to contribute in coding if i was able too, I'm not but this doesn't mean I can't expose problems, doubt, criticize the work done etc. Didn't I? I manage the Italian WP site adn i give supports to users, so this time I'm talking from end users perspective, i can live withour that plugin i can put some other script there is around to backup stuff etc, but lot, tons of people can't, don't know how, then they won't care for a different solution, but this should cover at least the same features of previous one. 2) Exporter is not born to substitute backup plugin, so there is any duplicate functionality till now, cause XML doesn't do the same works backup plugin does, if and when it will be and the importer will revert back from this backup.. all will be ok. -- Stefano Aglietti - StallonIt on IRCnet - ICQ#: 2078431 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sites: http://www.40annibuttati.it (personal blog) http://www.wordpress-it.it (WordPress Italia) _______________________________________________ wp-testers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
