Hi. I would keep the straight versioning. Instead, I would like to see a new branch left as legacy!
I mean, since the 2.1 legacy branch a lot of things and features had changed, and to this moment there's no another more updated legacy branch. Why would be needed a legacy branch? Why Ubuntu is offering a LTS (long time service) version for every major version? Because people want stability! I mean, If I want to create a bulletproof stable wordpress website (there's a lot of people that are using WordPress as a CMS), with a stable and 100% working and well known for everybody admin interface (to this moment admin panel had changed 3 times!), with a stable and 100% bugless plugin API (as a third party developer, I would like to not keep my eyes like a hawk on the wordpress trac), I need that legacy branch!!! Any opinions are welcomed... -- () Campania Panglicii în ASCII /\ http://stas.nerd.ro/ascii/ _______________________________________________ wp-testers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
