But i'll really like if it turns into Wordpress 3.0 3.0 +1
2008/11/18, Dan Coulter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Paleo Pat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> You any relation to Ann Coulter? >> > > I hope not. > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Idled Soul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Dan Coulter wrote: >> >>> Version numbers aren't decimal. If you add 0.1 onto 2.9, you get 2.10. >>> Just look at version 2.0.11. >>> >> >> Ah ha! My bad... I still think it should be left as 2.7 though, like >> someone else has stated earlier, it's been introduced as that and would >> cause confusion if changed now. :p > > > I agree. Had this conversation came up a while back, when the changes were > being planned, I might have thought that we should change it to 3.0. Now > it's too close to the release. Just wanted to make sure that people > realized that jumping from 2.6 to 3.0 is a lot different than jumping from > 2.6 to 2.8 and would not necessarily be artificial version inflation. > > -- > Dan Coulter > http://dancoulter.com/ > http://phpflickr.com/ > http://blogsforbands.com/ > > Hey, I got nothing to do today but smile > -Simon and Garfunkel > _______________________________________________ > wp-testers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers > -- Matheus Bonela www.MatheusBonela.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ wp-testers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
