Maybe we need to make the image processing more pluggable? You
shouldn't have to edit the core to do this. So please let us know if
you need some actions or filters to make this easier to do.
Westi
--
Peter Westwood
http://peter.Westwood.name
On 21 Feb 2009, at 22:20, Paul Robinson <[email protected]> wrote:
Actually scratch that I should have used Google properly. It's
already been
asked a crap load of times on the forum over the past 2 year &
people have
ended up just hacking WordPress instead. Oh well. :(
Paul.
2009/2/21 Paul Robinson <[email protected]>
Yeah, I know. I just don't see the point in joining a mailing list I
wouldn't often send emails too. It was just a question I'd had for
quite a
while that I needed answering. I also meant to add ***OT*** to the
subject,
and forgot.
Paul.
2009/2/21 Austin Matzko <[email protected]>
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Paul Robinson <[email protected]
>
wrote:
Anyway I was wondering if there it is planned or if there is a
plugin or
something to enable ImageMagick support for WordPress? I just
find it
altogether better than GD.
ImageMagick is wonderful. But it's often not installed on many
servers, and its PHP API class requires PHP 5.1.
For future reference, the WordPress ideas forum[1] and wp-hackers
mailing list are usually better for feature proposals. WP-testers
is
meant for discussing problems with development versions of WP.
[1] http://wordpress.org/extend/ideas/
[2] http://codex.wordpress.org/Mailing_Lists#Testers
_______________________________________________
wp-testers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
_______________________________________________
wp-testers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
_______________________________________________
wp-testers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
