Hi grubi, grubi wrote: > I just want to add that the "depends" on profile level is still very > useful so I would > keep it in future releases as it can reduce size and simplify profile > structure.
I fully agree. It was not my intention to mention that I am going to remove it. I will keep it for sure. > For clarity reasons the naming maybe should be changed to "include". Sure, these days I would call it "include" but also the "depends" node does the same job - so apart from possible confusion there is no reason to change it. Changing it would mean to break compatibility with very little advantages. Moreover I don't think that "real dependencies" on profiles make sense since multiple profile might refer to one and only package and dependencies exist between packages, not between profiles. So I will for sure keep it unless further notice. br, Rainer ------------------------------------------------------------------------- wpkg-users mailing list archives >> http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/wpkg-users/ _______________________________________________ wpkg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkg-users
