Rainer Meier wrote: > > > Sure, these days I would call it "include" but also the "depends" node > does the > same job - so apart from possible confusion there is no reason to change > it. > Changing it would mean to break compatibility with very little advantages. > >
Could I suggest that when you have some spare time :) that wpkg is modified to use "include" as well as "depends" in profiles.xml and then "depends" in profiles is documented as depreciated and then removed in a later version. regards Simon -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-depends-and-chain-tp24805726p24824335.html Sent from the WPKG - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- wpkg-users mailing list archives >> http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/wpkg-users/ _______________________________________________ wpkg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkg-users
