While I agree that it needs to be addressed, I'm not sure I want to enlarge
the scope when our success will depend on our ability to handle the workload
and address and resolve the issues presented.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Phillip Hallam-Baker
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 10:29 AM
To: Carl Wallace
Cc: [email protected]; Jon Callas
Subject: Re: [wpkops] Second draft charter proposal

I would like to see us 'do' something 'about' client authentication.

But I don't see much of a client PKI out there to be operated, I think we
are going to have to 'build stuff' to fix it. So I don't think its a PKI
operations issue.

I would prefer to see a separate, security area WG to look into the client
ops side. In particular I don't want to spend time trying to work out how to
automate the 'certificate lifecycle' premised on the idea that client certs
expire on an annual basis in a group where we can't ask why the cert has to
expire.

On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Carl Wallace <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On 8/30/12 12:28 PM, "Jon Callas" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>On Aug 30, 2012, at 9:18 AM, Carl Wallace wrote:
>>
>>>> And for issuers, it can be difficult to predict what proportion of 
>>>> the user population will accept a certificate chain with certain 
>>>> characteristics.  For instance, when a browser includes a nonce in 
>>>> an OCSP request but the server supplies a response that does not 
>>>> include the nonce, it is hard to know which browsers will accept 
>>>> and which will reject the response.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Is client authentication processing performed by web servers in scope?
>>>If
>>> not, explicitly push that out of scope.
>>
>>It would be nice if it were in scope. Client authorization is a vastly 
>>under-used feature.
>>
>>I wouldn't want to endanger everything else over it, but if we keep 
>>sweeping it under the rug, it will continue to languish.
>
> I agree and would like to see it stay in scope as well.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wpkops mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops



--
Website: http://hallambaker.com/
_______________________________________________
wpkops mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops

_______________________________________________
wpkops mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops

Reply via email to