On Sep 4, 2012, at 12:50, Ben Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: > While I agree that it needs to be addressed, I'm not sure I want to enlarge > the scope when our success will depend on our ability to handle the workload > and address and resolve the issues presented.
I would rather push it off than have an unfocused group, but I still think it is part of "web PKI" and someone has th address it, so why not us? If I connect to example.com, it proves to me who it is through a certificate. I want to prove to it who I am through a certificate, too. That's the two halves of web PKI and it's that latter part I would like to include, if possible. Jon _______________________________________________ wpkops mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops
