The WG milestone with respect to the Trust Models draft is that a draft be adopted as the 1st WG draft in June 2013. In order to accomplish that, a draft needs to be submitted early next week to give the WG members time to review, discuss and potentially an updated draft submitted for WG adoption before the end of June. If you and Inigo have an updated draft it should be submitted asap. If there are outstanding issues those could be identified on the mail list and input soliticited from WG membership.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of joel jaeggli Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 1:04 PM To: Bruce Morton; Paul Hoffman; [email protected] Cc: wpkops WG; "Iñigo Barreira ([email protected])" Subject: Re: [wpkops] Agenda Items for IETF 87 On 5/31/13 9:59 AM, Bruce Morton wrote: > Iñigo and I are working on a draft of the Trust Model document. I am not sure > that we will have time to get it prepared to a state that it will be able to > be published in the appropriate lead time before the Berlin meeting. > > I will not be able to attend the Berlin meeting, but Iñigo is seeing if he > can make it. > > I tend to agree with Paul that if the document has not been circulated and > there are no issues raised, then it will be difficult to have agenda items > for a meeting. It is the opinion of your AD that drafts that haven't been circulated shouldn't be presented. which is why it's worth having this dicussion now. thanks joel > > Bruce. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Paul Hoffman > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 12:28 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: wpkops WG > Subject: Re: [wpkops] Agenda Items for IETF 87 > > On May 31, 2013, at 8:53 AM, Jeremy Rowley <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Please email [email protected] with your agenda items for IETF 87 >> in Berlin. Also, if you are a document editor, please let us know whether >> you are attending the meeting and whether you plan to present an update. If >> you are not attending, please provide a status update on where you are on >> your project. > The documents were presented at the last IETF meeting in anticipation of the > documents being published. IETF face-to-face meetings are normally used for > discussing issues in the WG documents and presenting new work, but the WG > still has no documents published (and essentially no discussion on the list). > > Is there really a reason to meet face-to-face at the next meeting? Will any > of the WG documents be published before then? > > And yes, I ask this as a co-editor on one of the planned documents. It > doesn't seem worth writing the documents if there is no real interest in them. > > --Paul Hoffman > _______________________________________________ > wpkops mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops > _______________________________________________ > wpkops mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops > _______________________________________________ wpkops mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops _______________________________________________ wpkops mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops
