On 05/31/2013 05:59 PM, Bruce Morton wrote:
> Iñigo and I are working on a draft of the Trust Model document. I am not sure 
> that we will have time to get it prepared to a state that it will be able to 
> be published in the appropriate lead time before the Berlin meeting.
> 
> I will not be able to attend the Berlin meeting, but Iñigo is seeing if he 
> can make it.
> 
> I tend to agree with Paul that if the document has not been circulated and 
> there are no issues raised, then it will be difficult to have agenda items 
> for a meeting.

Speaking as an IETF participant who'd like to see this work done,
I'd really encourage editors to prioritise getting drafts out over
perfection.

S.

> Bruce.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
> Paul Hoffman
> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 12:28 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: wpkops WG
> Subject: Re: [wpkops] Agenda Items for IETF 87
> 
> On May 31, 2013, at 8:53 AM, Jeremy Rowley <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Please email [email protected] with your agenda items for IETF 87 
>> in Berlin.  Also, if you are a document editor, please let us know whether 
>> you are attending the meeting and whether you plan to present an update.  If 
>> you are not attending, please provide a status update on where you are on 
>> your project.
> 
> The documents were presented at the last IETF meeting in anticipation of the 
> documents being published. IETF face-to-face meetings are normally used for 
> discussing issues in the WG documents and presenting new work, but the WG 
> still has no documents published (and essentially no discussion on the list).
> 
> Is there really a reason to meet face-to-face at the next meeting? Will any 
> of the WG documents be published before then?
> 
> And yes, I ask this as a co-editor on one of the planned documents. It 
> doesn't seem worth writing the documents if there is no real interest in them.
> 
> --Paul Hoffman
> _______________________________________________
> wpkops mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops
> _______________________________________________
> wpkops mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops
> 
_______________________________________________
wpkops mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops

Reply via email to