On 20/12/2005, at 19:59, David-Baptiste Chirot wrote:
oh yes--i had a friend who had a Theremin and have tried it--many times,years ago-- does anyone remember the band Lothar and the Hand People? they used a Theremin-there is a video of a documentary on Theremin--it was on PBS Tv in the middlle 1990s--you may easily find--(they had it at Blockbuster last time iwas in there--)From: Kamen Nedev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "WRYTING-L : Writing and Theory across Disciplines" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [_arc.hive_] NEW [N]+Semble MP3 Album Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:10:08 +0100 Hmmm, has anybody here ever tried a Theremin? Moog used to make a MIDI-compatible one, two. Sound... Best, Kamen On 19/12/2005, at 6:58, Alan Sondheim wrote:Re the first paragraph, my apologies as well; we're going to Utah tomorrow and I'm a bit tense, also feeling physically ill. -Needless to say I agree with you. I also think there are things like theold Casio midi sax - you blew into it, and so there's all sorts ofpossibilties for interfacing. Most Midi people though use keyboards; they can be taylored (misspelling but it's a great pun!), but the tendency isof course towards either cleanliness or controlled/chaotic noise... Then there's granular synthesis which seems something else utterly different and exciting - Alan On Sun, 18 Dec 2005, mwp wrote:(Thanks for the clarification, AS. I sometimes tend to read an implied hostility into people’s writings where it is not intended, as I am sure they sometimes unintendedly read it into mine. I’m very tense tonightfor some reason. Sorry if I overreacted.) My short, silly list was meant to apply to written compositionalvariables, or to switches on a foot pedal for live performance. Forinstance, you want a particular passage you are playing on a MIDIinstrument to sound breathy, you press the ctrl-B button on the pedal. Crude, simple stuff, like a guitarist has with fuzzboxes, wahs, etc.only more localized and nuanced in the effect.I don’t think that an Ayler of today would feel too deprived of his “black spirituality” if he was playing a MIDI instrument of sampledsounds. He simply would find workarounds to create the effects hewanted, and while he wouldn't be the Ayler we know and love, he still would sound marvelously human. Look at somebody like Sun Ra, who was playing a clunky old DX7 when I saw him a few times. I don’t think that the rise of session players using digital instruments has much to do with the coldness of today’s music, as there were plenty of cold, boring session players working in places like Hollywood and Tin Pan Alley manydecades before there were commercial digital music programs andinstruments. I see today’s “coldness” has as much to do with a basicshift in attitude towards performance, -- from an existential“being-in-the-world” attitude, such as you described so well, to a morealoof, canned one that you get in rap, raves, etc. I don’t see the latter necessarily as a musical regression of any kind, or as adiminishment in music’s spirituality. If that causes Ayler to spin in his grave, well, every new generation has that effect on its elders!I haven't addressed your point about live vs computer at all, eventhough it was fundamental to what you were saying, because I basicallyagree with you and see nothing to add. mbeing preposterously verbose, as always, and now I will shut up and gointo a long self-imposed glottal hibernation... On Dec 18, 2005, at 8:46 PM, Alan Sondheim wrote:On Sun, 18 Dec 2005, mwp wrote:[Arggh, I feel the hostility meter starting to flutter into the redIf that’s the case, I’m outta here.]No hostility intended.Don’t know why such a list of commands wouldn’t cut it to bring some sense of life to a piece. Composers use such notations all the time to indicate precisely what they need from performers, and Talan M’s work is a composition, not a performance, however much he may intend it to sound “performed.” And there’s no reason these controls couldn’t beIt may well bring life into a piece. That's not what I was on about; ofimplemented live in real time with foot pedals or something, so there’s plenty of room for overlap between composition and performance.course I agree with you here.I don’t believe improvisation can ever be totally in the “moment.” Improvisors are always recycling and borrowing from buried experience and spinning motifs, etc. The idea of the mind as blank slate creatingNo one ever said improvisation came out of a blank slate; of course it doesn't. But it is in real time, and all that recycling etc. - more important where you are in the piece - can't be a second-take; what you do then is what you get. And there's no 'nothingness' - there are chopsorder out of nothingness just doesn’t “cut it” for me.and what you're doing.There's a whole politics behind this, which Ayler and New Thing music in general came out of. It came out of the black revolution of the 60s as well, and the rhetoric around it was part of it; with people like Baraka it entered linguistically into the pieces as well. And this politics was connected with notions of black soul, black body, black spirituality, even the black church. At least for myself, I can't put this aside. In other words improvisation - being-live-in- performanceswas _inherently_ part of the music of these musicians. And by ctl doesn't cut it, what I meant was, take your commands - SAXOPHONE: Flatten the pitch in the upper registers YES Squeak SELECT PHRASE + ctrl-S Pad SELECT PHRASE + ctrl-P Breath SELECT PHRASE + ctrl-B Force virtual fingering SELECT PHRASE + ctrl-V Etc.- Take the first. How much flattening? In relation to what? In what phrase? What do you do about the control and dimunition with the upperovertones that occurs when you slack the reed a bit? Etc. etc.This doesn't mean you can't 'set' an Ayler-type solo, note-by- note modification; you could always build something out of sine- waves note by note. It's not magic. But it is missing the point - when 'squeaks' are used, they mean something about the soul and positioning of the musician at that point; they're not devices. It's also very hard to program a squeal (if that's what you mean, you generally don't get padsqueak, so I think you're referencing the reed?), which has incredibly-fast changing overtones resulting from teeth/lip/pressure/moisture-degree/breath/- pressure - all changing dynamically at an equally incredibly-fast speed.I do agree with Talan's take, which seems a bit different than yours. In any case I've heard a lot of electronics, as I'm sure you have as well, and the types of sonority that Talan uses seem fairly accessible; on the other hand, I've heard nothing approaching, say, Bells, in thatregard. - AlanFor URLs, DVDs, CDs, books/etc. see http://www.asondheim.org/ advert.txt . Contact: Alan Sondheim, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Generaldirectory of work: http://www.asondheim.org ._________________________________________________________________Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
