only
Hegel
need approve
Hegel ~
Good enigma been gash fluo
14:27 10/05/06 852 bytes

cou,dn leaf it alone
C'est la mien.




On 5-Oct-06, at 2:05 PM, ////////////////////////// wrote:

would HEGEL approve otherwise
 


William Bain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Neat as heck in my very humble opinion. I would note though that in some respects "plus ça change". I'm humbly thinking (I admire Alan's stuff no end and have never made any secret of that) of where golden means and sections or aspects of golden means come in. Is chaos an aspect of the golden mean? Is it simply that we're never able to get distance enough to see the connections of the fractals? Meanwhile, as I say, in my opinion, very neat stuff, Hegelian or otherwise.

Jim Piat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Well, I'm no Hegal and I don't know just what you have in mind Alan but by
the time I finished reading it I found myself smiling. For some reason my
machine can not read your machine so I miss many of your mpmpm%^&*\ files.
But what you say below is comforting.

More generally it's also fun becoming familiar with the various poetry
personalities on this list. Like listening in on a fascination coversation
some of which takes place in braille, sign language and god knows what.


> Existential
>
>
> http://www.asondheim.org/existential.mp4
>
> In this endless variant, distorted (so that rotations and translations in
> 3-space will be clear) cones model a full motion-capture body generated by
> Poser; the original movements are from bearing.mp4 .
>
> So the 3 recent pieces: existential.mp4, bearing.mp4, and sartre.mp4 - all
> concerned with the distorted project of existential human. Now in this
> latest, the vague outlines of body are more or less visible... I could see
> a meta-ball construction relating the body itself, extrusion of Lingis /
> Lingam.
>
> I keep moving through these spaces, one step at a time - the goal - which
> I will not attempt with the machinery I use - would be a .bvh file of
> hundreds of thousands of nodes, modeling human behavior against the back-
> ground of culture and ecology. And the result? An inconceivable construct
> of hundreds of thousands of meta-objects, taking shape, joining, giving an
> image of Godhead Creation itself (Godhead Creating, Creating Godhead).
> _That_ is the face of Levinas or Sartre, _that_ is the peripheral of Vito
> Acconci or Leder, _that_ is semiotic in relation to Kristevan semiotic,
> positive entropy of information in relation to negative entropy of infor-
> mation. It is unimaginable; the space would be huge, the files enormous,
> the rendering a question of months, not hours. Yet at the end is a Shadow
> waiting for clarity.
>
> I think Hegel would approve.

Stay in the know. Pulse on the new Yahoo.com. Check it out.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
P!^VP

Reply via email to