I thought of that, but the example on the page where I got the link was some british science writers booknook, so it necessarily colored my thinking. his sloppy asisness was interestin, mine a little less so, but still wanted to do one.
i'll give it a shot in the morning after work. and try to use some smaller images maybe. sorry about the crashes. i load in 10-15 meg images into mozilla regularly. lq > Somehow your study looks exactly the way I thought it would. Maybe a > bit neater (as compared to mine, at least), but other than that. . . > > As far as Autostitch is concerned, I'd be curious to know how it > handles a sequence of random images with no connection to each other. > (Not having Windows, I can't put it to the test myself.) > > m > > > > On Nov 9, 2006, at 9:58 AM, phanero wrote: > >> a sloppy view into my sloppy study using Autostitch for the 1st time. >> http://www.phaneronoemikon.org/images/phano1.jpg >> >> Autostitch >> http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~mbrown/autostitch/autostitch.html >> >
