Well, in case anyone is interested, support solved my problem (Thanks). There were a bunch of old entries in the transfer manager that had been interrupted for one reason or another. Once I deleted them, the memory usage decreased to less than 9MB.
Regards, Tom >Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 11:50:02 -0800 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: Tom Feliz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: [WS_FTP Forum] 50-65MB Memory Footprint??? > >Thanks for the input. That's what I was afraid of. I haven't been able to >get an answer from IP Switch support. I did receive a response, but the >support agent that responded seemed to confused about what a memory >footprint is. Oh well... Hopefully they figure it out. I've been using >WS_FTP for a lot of years now. I really don't look forward to switching to >another ftp client at this point. > >-Tom > >At 12:16 PM 1/11/2002 -0700, you wrote: >>Tom, >> >>For what it's worth, my WS_FTP Pro 7.0 is using 9MB. I'm using 7.0 >>because I found too many quirky problems with the more recent dot >>releases. >> >>--Gene >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Feliz >>Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:24 AM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: [WS_FTP Forum] 50-65MB Memory Footprint??? >> >>Is it normal for WS_FTP Pro (version 7.04) to have a 60MB+ memory >>footprint >>(per the task manager)? I'm running Windows 2000 and have 384MB of RAM. >> >>Maybe some other end users of WS_FTP could confirm this for me as >>IPSwitch's support seems to be stumped or something. >> >>Thanks, >> >>Tom >> >> >>Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be >>removed from this list. >> >> >>Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be >>removed from this list. Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list.
