So we should register googlegoldomatic.com now for russomatutorialivinguru 

Excellent advice James.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 3:39 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [WSG] Search Engines
> 
> 
> Hi Colm,
> 
> What exactly do you mean by "old search engine hacks"?
> 
> These days search usually means "Google".
> 
> The guys at Google are doing their best to lower ranking (and 
> in some cases remove all together) any/all sites using 
> suspect tatics to gain search results.
> 
> Stuff that will help with search result ranking:
> 
> - Clean, VALID code (strip out formatting to your CSS file 
> wherever possible)
> 
> - Small to medium sized pages (google has some arbitrary 
> limit on how much content per page it will index)
> 
> - dont hide content (if possible)
> 
> - dont put content in javascript
> 
> - avoid nasty UUID based query string values
> 
> - <TITLE>'s!!! Make sure every page is unique
> 
> - Structure your documents properly. i.e. use Hx tags if your 
> presenting a heading
> 
> - lots of links comming in and going out
> 
> - most importantly, lots of content, regularly updated. 
> Google will learn how often your site changes and index 
> accordingly. Also, more people will link to you if you have 
> good content (i.e. O'matic series is Google gold).
> 
> cheers,
> ____________________________
> James Silva
> Web Production
> Gruden Pty Ltd
> 
> Tel:   +61 02 9956 6388
> Fax:   +61 02 9956 8433
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Web:   http://www.gruden.com
> ____________________________
> 
>  
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I am in the process of revamping a site to being standards 
> compliant. 
> > One of the issues I wish to address is removing all the old search 
> > engine hacks and implementing more standards based ways of 
> raising the 
> > profile of the site.
> > 
> > The site is a large corporate served with XHTML / CSS / 
> XML(+some cgi)
> > 
> > I dont know if this is OT, but I imagine many of you may have come 
> > across this problem before.
> > 
> > Any advice / sites that may be of use?
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Colm
> > *****************************************************
> > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
> > *****************************************************
> > 
> 
> *****************************************************
> The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
> ***************************************************** 
> 

*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
***************************************************** 

Reply via email to