Or why follow standards at all? XHTML is a newer standard than HTML, and people move to newer standards because of what they can provide. If you could move to XHTML (ie moving to newer technology for future compatibility etc.) and keep a consistent look of your page without restricting your audience then would it not be best practice?
Tim Hill Computer Associates Graphic Artist tel: +612 9937 0792 fax: +612 9937 0546 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: Mark Stanton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 9:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [WSG] A quick XHTMLquestion Fox in the hen house, but why the hell would you want to use XHTML 1.1? Or XHTML at all for that matter. If your argument is you want to keep up with current best practice, then forget new windows & forget JS because they are not best practice. Also I'd say that HTML 4.01 is not any less a part of best practice than XHTML. Sorry - its just a pet peeve of mine. XHTML is a great concept, but HTML 4.01 is great in practice. Cheers Mark ------------------ Mark Stanton Technical Director Gruden Pty Ltd Tel: 9956 6388 Mob: 0410 458 201 Fax: 9956 8433 http://www.gruden.com ***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ ***************************************************** ***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ *****************************************************
