Completely agree Gary, but it is fun to push the envelope a bit. With a <dl> you can make it quite table-like, and in some cases the dl may be more semantically correct (though I don't think this is one of those cases).
Table-like <dl> example: http://www.maxdesign.com.au/jobs/css/peterottery2.htm Russ > Well - at the risk of getting flamed (fire retardant underwear turned up > to full strength) - this looks to me like it should be a <table>. > > Meaning - <table> still is a valid markup tool when what you are marking > up is a table of information. Rows and Columns. > > And you will get the added bonus of it retaining the "table like" nature > when downgrading to older browsers. > > I realise you have said you want to keep it as a simple ordered list - but > I am not sure of the reason why. > > > > Gary Menzel ***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ *****************************************************
