Also http://www.hinterlands.com.au/testing/css_image_replacement.html http://www.hinterlands.com.au/testing/css/css_image_replacement.css
Chris On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 14:55, Scott Mebberson wrote: > I'm not sure about any font examples like the Visibone one, however, did > you ever see this at Russ' website: > http://www.maxdesign.com.au/presentation/headings-as-images/index.cfm > > It's a nice article about using images for headings, but still getting > all the benefits of Hx tags. > > I'm in the same boat as you. Our designers love to use image headings, > but I hate it for a whole swag of reasons, mailing search engine > placements which using images (usually) kills. Anyhow, I found it to be > a great article. Hopefully it'll help you with this issue too. You may > have to compromise! > > cheers, > > Scott. > > Kay Smoljak wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > I've been lurking here for a while, but seeing Russ's excellent > > presentation at the meeting before MXDU has encouraged me to be more > > active. I'm the appointed "Standards/QA Nazi" in my workplace, as > > well as being in charge of search engine marketing for our clients. > > Oh, and I'm supposedly also the senior ColdFusion developer, not that > > there's a lot of time left for that! > > > > I'm trying to put together a list of resources for our graphic > > designers on styling heading tags - h1, h2 etc. Basically, they want > > to use images for everything, and I want them to use styled text > > instead. I'd like to show them the range of fonts that they can quite > > safely use as well as some awesome-looking examples of styled > > headings, to make them stop whinging. I have the visibone font > > survey[1] already - does anyone know of any other resources or great > > examples? > > > > Thanks! > > > > Kay. > > > > [1] Visibone font survey: http://www.visibone.com/font/FontResults.html > > > > > > --- > > http://kay.smoljak.com > > > > ***************************************************** > > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > > ***************************************************** > ***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ *****************************************************
