> > In the (odd) case i'm right, is there some spec that states that an > > image always needs a description?
The http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd requires an alt attribute for images, and the HTML DTD shows a similar requirement: <!ELEMENT img EMPTY> <!ATTLIST img %attrs; src %URI; #REQUIRED alt %Text; #REQUIRED longdesc %URI; #IMPLIED height %Length; #IMPLIED width %Length; #IMPLIED usemap %URI; #IMPLIED ismap (ismap) #IMPLIED > ***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help *****************************************************
