El jue, 06-05-2004 a las 18:08, Peter Firminger escribi�:
> > I'm sure lot's of people probably use <em> when they aren't really
> > emphasising something, but simply wanting to make something italic.
> 
> Absolutely! In natural science (specifically speaking about species names
> here) Italics are the way to present the scientific name (genus species pair
> or "senior synonym"  like <i>Thorunna australis</i> or even just the species
> or shorthand variations), not "emphasis". I think there is a good argument
> for using <i> here as it isn't ambiguous in any way that I want italics. In
> this case <em> is just semantically wrong and <i> simply should not be
> deprecated.
> 

I'm sure there are times when i is the right element to use, but your
example is not one :)

If the markup means 'look, this is a genus species pair', please make it
tell so:

1) <seniorsynonym>Thorunna Australis</seniorsynonym>
2) <span class="seniorsynonim">Thorunna Australis</seniorsynonym>
3) <i>Thorunna Australis</i>


1) is not available to current browsers without involving extra
technology 
2) is nice, clean and optimal in the current day and time.
3) is pretty useless

> 
> But in most cases we certainly don't need this as we are marking up text for
> the sake of displaying text, not extraction for any other reason by any
> other agent. The extra bytes are a total waste of bandwidth and when you get
> to heavily used repositories of text-based factsheets like
> http://amonline.net.au/fishes/fishfacts/specfam.htm or
> http://seaslugforum.net/species.htm it can make quite a difference in speed
> and money.

First, i don't think we should discuss specific cases. If you need to
save bandwith by using i instead of span.class, it's entirely up you of
course. We're talking general principles/best practices

I don't think (given that we are using clean, well marked code) that
there's a clear and present global need for saving bandwith by switching
from span.class

 
>- 
Manuel trabaja para Simplel�gica, construcci�n web
(+34) 985 22 12 65         http://simplelogica.net 

*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
*****************************************************

Reply via email to