[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > One possible flaw in voting is that we cant tell what code been used > in each site, in terms of efficiency, page weight (size in kb) and > which is most compatible across browsers.
The designs aren't actual HTML pages yet, just JPEG mockups. According to the design competition page (http://discuss.webstandardsgroup.org/archives/000012.htm) writing the code is the next step: " Cut and build When a winner has been announced we will move straight into the cut and build phase. Each step in the process will be opened up for discussion by members before it takes place. We will do a step every 24 hours. Steps will include. * Basic page structure * Accessibility layer links, access keys, skip menu * Styling each container (a series of steps) * Choosing a method of hiding from older browsers * Print CSS " -- Lindsay Evans. ***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help *****************************************************
