Robert Reed wrote:
Maybe so, but if that's your short term goal, then it's time to give up on Web Standards. Wars are rarely won in a single battle. I think it would be a major victory for WS if IE drops to 80% over the next two years. There is no need to topple IE, just to put enough pressure to make MS accountable and to become compliant.M$ will dominate the browser market for a while to come - fact. Combine XP's lack of success in the corporate world and MS unwillingness to give MSIE users an upgrade path without an OS upgrade, and you'll begin to see a change. One more thing will be required: Web pages need to be better on compliant browsers. For people to switch there must be a tangible advantage to switching. For what ever reason, security has been a no-go. The learning curve to use a new browser, no matter how slight, is an obstacle. Since most people tend to be visually oriented to some degree, if it looks better, even just a little, there is a chance they'll relate to it. |
- Re: [WSG] 'It Works in Gecko Browsers ...' John Allsopp
- Re: [WSG] 'It Works in Gecko Browsers ...' Justin French
- Re: [WSG] 'It Works in Gecko Browsers ...' Brian Foy
- Re: [WSG] 'It Works in Gecko Browsers ...' Mordechai Peller
- Re: [WSG] 'It Works in Gecko Browsers ...' Justin French
- Re: [WSG] 'It Works in Gecko Browsers ...' Rimantas Liubertas
- Re: [WSG] 'It Works in Gecko Browsers ...' Justin French
- RE: [WSG] 'It Works in Gecko Browsers ...' P.H.Lauke
- RE: [WSG] 'It Works in Gecko Browsers ...' Jamie Mason
- RE: [WSG] 'It Works in Gecko Browsers ...' Robert Reed
- Re: [WSG] 'It Works in Gecko Browsers ...' Mordechai Peller
- Re: [WSG] 'It Works in Gecko Browsers ...' Brian Foy
