If anyone does have IE5 OS9 and feels like having a go, drop me a line! :)
P
On 20/05/2004, at 3:08 PM, Rick Faaberg wrote:
On 5/19/04 9:56 PM "Universal Head" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out:<x-tad-bigger>
I've just finished a simple site that is perfect in
WIN - NN 7, IE 5.01, IE 5.5, IE 6
MAC - Safari 1.2.1, Mozilla 1.4, IE 5.2
And a friend looks it in on Mac IE 5 and finds a big problem.
My question is, do you draw the line or not? Do I spend more time time trying
to track down this one dumb version number browser's problem, or do I just say
it's not worth it?
For me it would depend on what the problem is and whether there's a known
fix or workaround, keeping to standards of course! :-)
Perhaps a tweak of the design could bypass the problem (whatever it is)
entirely?
Rick
*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
*****************************************************
</x-tad-bigger>Universal Head�
Design That Works.
7/43 Bridge Rd Stanmore
NSW 2048 Australia
T (+612) 9517 1466
F (+612) 9565 4747
E [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W www.universalhead.com
