Sorry for the late reply. Thanks for the thoughts Hugh. It helps with my
final decision :)


I'm using the Gilder/Levin Method FIR
http://www.mezzoblue.com/tests/revised-image-replacement/ as I want the
words to show on image off.

I'm not very sure with IE Mac. Pleasing IE Mac has always been a huge
challenge for me :P Has anyone used a FIR that actually works with IE Mac
but on the condition that the words will show on image off?

The is the CSS I am using:

#logo 
        {
        width                           : 100px;
        height                          : 70px;
        position                        : relative;
        margin-left                     : 600px;
        padding-top                     : 13px;
        }
        
#logo span 
        {
        background                      :
url(../../../images/global/logo/logo.gif) no-repeat;
        position                        : absolute;
        width                           : 100%;
        height                          : 100%;
        }


Best Wishes, 
Jaime .......




-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Hugh Todd
Sent: Friday, 28 May 2004 6:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Comment and site check

Jaime,

I was thinking that the logo image actually has a semantic meaning 
(which can be represented by an "alt" tag). Changing the version of the 
logo would be a simple matter of replacing your image file with one of 
the same name.

But your using an h1 probably makes more semantic sense in the 
hierarchy of the page (and the image you use as replacement is exactly 
to the point). So if you stay with this solution, all you have to do is 
figure out what's going wrong in IE 5 Mac... if that's important 
enough.

-Hugh

> For the logo, I was thinking about future site update. They have a 
> couple
> version of logo and might wish to swap them around. The logo might be 
> of
> different size. A background logo using CSS will save me lots of time 
> if the
> logo change. It's either that or changing the image file name but I 
> feel
> that the background technique will be easier to work with.
>
> What's your thoughts?

*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
***************************************************** 


*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
***************************************************** 

Reply via email to