In Northeastern US, the states are geographically very small, so a New England Chapter which encompasses about 6 states, or even a New York, New England chapter 7 states may work.
Is there anyway to organize your graph by region? Nancy Johnson -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lachlan Hardy Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 7:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WSG] A California meeting? was Brisbane July Meeting - Report Sean Corfield wrote: > Question to Peter - is the city/state level membership information > available in aggregate so we can figure out what might work for > regional US meetings? Well, I wouldn't dare speak for Peter, but the member location list he indicated previously in this discussion - http://webstandardsgroup.org/manage/login_view.cfm? - is ordered from right to left. Therefore everyone is grouped according to country, then state, and then city For example, there are around 30 members in California - 4 listed in San Diego, 3 in LA, 3 in Sacramento, 3 in San Francisco and various others. So if, as someone suggested (Peter again?), everyone were to put the closest major city they are willing to attend a meeting at, those numbers might increase a bit Cheers, Lachlan ***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ***************************************************** ***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help *****************************************************
