> If there were a california meeting, my vote goes for L.A. > Sacramento, is well, Sacramento. Not exactly my idea of a place to visit > and spend an extra day. San Francisco is great, but expensive. L.A. is > more central, has plenty of room, and can be affordable. Of course, if my > job covered the trip I wouldn't mind a trip to SF. > > I'm in San Diego, which is a great place for a meeting, but too far for > our SF and Sacramento(sorry about the above slight) members. L.A. or San > Diego might also be better for our Arizona and Nevada people. > > Ted >
Near S.F. can be affordable. The price ranges are the same as in L.A. Plus the public transit is better in S.F. than L.A. which might be easier for out of town visitors. ***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help *****************************************************
