Hi Geoff,

>>But still it is no guarantee to maintain the sites
>>standards compliance when you hand it over to the client

Actually, we are working hard to address this specific issue. Check out
http://xstandard.com

Regards,
-Vlad
XStandard Development Team
XHTML Strict / 1.1 WYSIWYG Editor



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Geoff Deering" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 6:45 PM
Subject: RE: [WSG] CMS


> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Amit Karmakar
> >
> > When we say CMS we mean Content Management, well in a nut shell
> > managing the content, publishing etc. Content Management and
> > Validation of code are 2 different things.
> > What does the group think?
> >
>
> I think the boundaries are slightly blurred in this area.  It's true that
> CMSs and Code validation are separate in many products.  If a CMS was to
> enforce code validation it would loose acceptance and market share in the
> quirks mode market.  So most CMSs wisely have these features as add in
> modules, plugins, macros, whatever, which facilitates both market needs.
>
> These tools are not so much a requirement for the developers sake, as most
> standards based developers can easily build templates that will validate.
> The problem comes in with users adding content via whatever means the CMS
> facilitates this, and having backend tools to clean this up to meet
> standards based QA.
>
> The minute you have users adding content, and you want to address W3C
> standards and web accessibility, the ATAG guidelines
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/ATAG10/ & http://www.w3.org/TR/ATAG10-TECHS/) come
> into play.  These guidelines are meant to address any type of authoring of
> web sites, including any form with a textarea for posting content.
>
> If you read these guidelines and have a problem with them in the context
of
> web based authoring, I share your dilemma, because there are issues here
> that need to be addressed in ATAG2 to better serve all areas of web
> authoring
> (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2004JanMar/0104.html).
>
> It's very difficult, almost impossible to comply with ATAG when deploying
> web based authoring interfaces, but the development community has
addressed
> this issue to a large degree to make our life easier with the backend
tools
> to address these requirements.
>
> Any front end or backend system that allows users to manage content is by
> definition an authoring tool, and if you want to maintain the standards
> integrity of your site then you need to check and make sure that all
> authoring input is parsed, checked, corrected and validated before
> publishing it, otherwise non valid markup can enter your system and your
> page is no longer valid.  Of course this is not much of a problem if you
> don't really care about standards compliant markup.
>
> MT, TextPattern, Drupal, Plone, Cocoon, etc all have modules to manage
this
> requirement.  But still it is no guarantee to maintain the sites standards
> compliance when you hand it over to the client.  If they are allowed
access
> to the engine or templates, then the QA standards compliance component of
> the deliverable is then void (at least that's how I work, cause if you
don't
> state this clearly, they will come back at you for delivering a faulty
> publishing system).
>
> But as far as most of the commercial offerings, like Interwoven Teamsite,
> Documentum, etc are concerned, I don't think they address this issue at
all,
> I could be wrong, I don't know them that well, but I have used them
briefly
> and didn't see anything to address these issues.
>
> Geoff
>
> *****************************************************
> The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
> *****************************************************
>
>


*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
***************************************************** 

Reply via email to