When I have time I'll start a new thread addressing this issue over on the cms list where we should continue it.
Geoff > -----Original Message----- > From: Amit Karmakar > > We use Interwoven's Teamsite at work. Going from version 5.5.2 to 6.1 > has been nothing but a disaster. The Standard version of 6.1 is buggy > and as they put it they are working on it and would probably have a > solution in the coming months. > that is not having a go at Teamsite... but all i am trying to say is.. > > validation I still think is a different kettle of fish than content > management. and on the premise that were true.... and agreeable(though > I know the boundaries are rather vague here) CMS should not have a > sales pitch that their code is 'valid' as opposed to the rest. > > CMS by definition are modules that manage content. If they did > validate code(not a requirement) that is good but a rather redundant > feature. Validation is the work of the architect, designer, developer > not the module. therefore, selling a product or trying to with a 'we > produce valid code' is an eyewash! > my $0.02 > > no I dont have anything against WordPress but i do think that > statement is a mouthful. > ***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help *****************************************************
