I think that like anything to do with building for the web, it all has to do with what is most appropriate for the project and the audience. If it's for a web site, I's take the path that renders most reliably across browsers/platforms, but if it's for an intranet (or other closed environment when you know the exact makeup of the audience and their equipment), I'd go for the most semantically correct method.

In practice, I haven't come across too many examples where you can't strike a (more or less) happy medium.

Cam

Herrod, Lisa wrote:

... between each link.

Just make sure it's with css and not a pipe :)

-----Original Message-----
From: Luke Moulton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 2:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] Semantics vs Light Code


Recent discussions about building a footer with numerous linked items styled as an unordered list has got me thinking about correct semantics verses light code/css.

In using strictly correct semantics to mark-up content I think sometimes
we run the risk of developing over complicated and bloated code.
Building an inline, styled un-ordered list with appropriate css can add
a bit of bulk to your css.

So on one hand there's smaller file sizes, uncomplicated CSS (with fewer
hacks) but imperfect semantics, and on the other there's perfect
semantics bloated CSS with a few hacks thrown in for good measure.

Where does one draw the line?

Luke Moulton

Go4 Multimedia
Web Design & Graphic Design
www.go4.com.au

******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************








******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************



Reply via email to