Hi Rick, You're not tied to using the W3C images, and there are a few good replacements around. I'm using a pretty common set of examples on the front page of my site (http://www.klp.com.au/). They're not mine, and I've forgotten exactly where I borrowed them from (so apologies to the original creator), but they are free to use (otherwise I wouldn't be using them).
I also agree with your last point - the general public neither knows nor cares about this stuff. We developers only do it for self-congratulation and brownie points from other developers and standards zealots. I'd certainly think twice (or more) before putting them on a client's site. Cheers, Kevin On 18/10/04 12:50 PM, "Rick Faaberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Who can I send a suggestion to at W3C that they make their web badges a lot > more subtle (and smaller) so that I would actually use them on my sites? > > Or do I just put up text that says "W3C Valid"? Is that what you do? > > Or just forget it entirely, 'cause who beside developers care in the first > place? > > Best, > > Rick Faaberg > > ****************************************************** > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help > ****************************************************** ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
