Thanks Susan, i spent a while trawling through old posts to find the thread , but found it instructive, The article Serving XHTML 1.0 (http://www.w3.org/International/articles/serving-xhtml/) helped clarify the subject for me.
with regards
Steven Faulkner
Web Accessibility Consultant
National Information & Library Service (NILS)
454 Glenferrie Road
Kooyong Victoria 3144
Phone: (613) 9864 9281
Fax: (613) 9864 9210
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
National Information Library Service
A subsidiary of RBS.RVIB.VAF Ltd.
"Susan R.
Grossman" To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<susan.rgrossman@ cc:
gmail.com> Subject: Re: [WSG] discussion
at juicy studio: It's all in the MIME
Sent by:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
group.org
11/11/2004 09:57
AM
Please respond to
wsg
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:23:43 +1100,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't agree
> with people encouraging content developers to deliver XHTML as text/html.
"
>
> I wondered what other memebrs on the list thought about it and its
> implications?
The problem from my point is the lack of support by IE and the hoops
to jump through to serve otherwise, so I will continue using xhtml 1.0
strict served as text/html.
There was a discussion of this on the list in early October , I
believe the heading was "is XHTML Dangerous" that if you haven't read,
you'd probably find interesting.
--
Susan R. Grossman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
