Richard,

It sounds interesting. I never knew it, my bad.
I thought UTF-8 format is plain text. I will
give it a try when I go home.

Thank you very much.

--- Richard Ishida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Boke,
> 
> There is no reason at all that the validator
> would choke on Turkish
> characters, if the text is properly encoded in
> utf-8.
> 
> I ran a test, and think I know what the problem
> is. If you run the validator
> on your current page [1], but tell it that the
> encoding is utf-8 (which it
> is not - it's iso-8859-9), you get exactly the
> same error message.
> 
> This suggests to me that you didn't actually
> save your file as UTF-8, you
> just changed the encoding declaration in the
> meta tag. You should try saving
> the file as utf-8 (see how to do this for
> various editors [2]), and change
> the encoding declaration.  Then it should work.
> 
> RI   
> 
> 
> 
> [1]
>
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fira.com.tr%2Fy%2F&charset=utf
> -8&doctype=Inline&verbose=1
> 
> [2]
>
http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-setting-encoding-in-application
> s
> 
> 
> ============
> Richard Ishida
> W3C
> 
> contact info:
> http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/ 
> 
> W3C Internationalization:
> http://www.w3.org/International/ 
> 
> Publication blog:
> http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/
>  
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Boke Yuzgen
> > Sent: 22 November 2004 21:35
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [WSG] yuzgen.com review please
> > 
> > Lang attributes:
> > Fixed.
> > 
> > UTF-8 instead of ISO:
> > Here's the validator's message:
> > "Sorry, I am unable to validate this document
> because on 
> > lines 7-9, 11, 79, 84, 86-87, 89-92, 101,
> 104-107, 114 it 
> > contained one or more bytes that I cannot
> interpret as utf-8 
> > (in other words,
> > 
> > the bytes found are not valid values in the
> specified 
> > Character Encoding). Please check both the
> content of the 
> > file and the character encoding indication."
> > 
> > It doesn't like the Turkish characters. I
> simply won't write 
> > any UTF-8 codes while writing an article to
> my web site. If 
> > it doesn't validate my web page some day some
> how because of 
> > Turkish characters, I won't mind if my pages
> render correct. 
> > If my pages don't render correct with the
> Turkish characters 
> > in the code, I will use Flash. ;)
> > 
> > Because English speaking people can simply
> write for the web 
> > by hitting one character they know.
> > Why shoulf non-English speaking people like
> me bother 
> > character entities etc? Also, I know I can
> use find&replace 
> > on multi files at the same time, but I won't
> do that. Then I 
> > will have to backup two copies of each page
> (eg. if I want to 
> > use my text elsewhere, what will I do then?
> Reconvert to the 
> > original?).
> > 
> > - Why?
> > - Because W3C said so.
> > 
> > Thank you for your comment.
> > 
> > --- Boke Yuzgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > > I will fix lang when I go home. I'm at work
> now.
> > > I use W3C's validator. I will also post the
> error it reports when I 
> > > use UTF-8 when I go home.
> > > 
> > > Thank you,
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- Richard Ishida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Interesting.  Which validator are you
> using?
> > > > 
> > > > By rights, it shouldn't validate as is,
> since XML requires an XML 
> > > > declaration (ie. <?xml version="1.0"
> > > > encoding="iso-8859-9"?>) when not using
> utf-8.
> > > > 
> > > > Did you note the comment about lang
> > > attributes?
> > > > 
> > > > RI
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > ============
> > > > Richard Ishida
> > > > W3C
> > > > 
> > > > contact info:
> > > > http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/
> > > > 
> > > > W3C Internationalization:
> > > > http://www.w3.org/International/
> > > > 
> > > > Publication blog:
> > > > http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/
> > > >  
> > > >  
> > > > 
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > > Behalf
> > > > Of Boke Yuzgen
> > > > > Sent: 22 November 2004 12:49
> > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Subject: RE: [WSG] yuzgen.com review
> please
> > > > > 
> > > > > Idid it first, but my pages won't
> validate
> > > if
> > > > I use UTF-8.
> > > > > 
> > > > > --- Richard Ishida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Please change
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > <html
> > > xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";
> > > > > > xml:lang="en" lang="en">
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > <html
> > > xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";
> > > > > > xml:lang="tr" lang="tr">
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Have you considered using UTF-8,
> rather
> > > > than
> > > > > > charset=iso-8859-9 ?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Hope that helps,
> > > > > > RI
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > ============
> > > > > > Richard Ishida
> > > > > > W3C
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > contact info:
> > > > > > http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > W3C Internationalization:
> > > > > > http://www.w3.org/International/
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Publication blog:
> > > > > > http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/
> > > > > >  
> > > > > >  
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On
> > > > Behalf
> > > > > > Of Boke Yuzgen
> > > > > > > Sent: 22 November 2004 09:12
> > > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > Subject: [WSG] yuzgen.com review
> please
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >  
> > > > > > > Can you please review this site?
> Site
> > > > > > language is not English.
> > > > > > >  
> > > > > > > http://yuzgen.com/
> > > > > > >  
> > > > > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > > > > >  
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Boke Yuzgen
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
******************************************************
> > > > The discussion list for
> > > > http://webstandardsgroup.org/
> > > > 
> > > >  See
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> > > >  for some hints on posting to the list &
> getting help
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
******************************************************
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >           
> > > __________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!? 
> > > The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free! 
> > > http://my.yahoo.com
> > >  
> > > 
> > >
> >
>
******************************************************
> > > The discussion list for
> > > http://webstandardsgroup.org/
> > > 
> > >  See
> > >
> >
>
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> > >  for some hints on posting to the list &
> getting help
> > >
> >
>
******************************************************
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >             
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!? 
> > Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today! 
> > http://my.yahoo.com 
> >  
> > 
> >
>
******************************************************
> > The discussion list for 
> http://webstandardsgroup.org/
> > 
> >  See
>
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> >  for some hints on posting to the list &
> getting help
> >
>
******************************************************
> > 
> 
>
******************************************************
> The discussion list for 
> http://webstandardsgroup.org/
> 
>  See
>
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
>  for some hints on posting to the list &
> getting help
>
******************************************************
> 
> 



                
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today! 
http://my.yahoo.com 
 

******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************

Reply via email to