Chris, Thanks for your response. It's funny - before I went to using unordered lists for this, I had been using ALA's recommendation. However I wasn't very happy with it semantically.
Ted Drake made this distinction: "With the current div setup, you have information but there is no connection between the data." Marc Broad also had similar thoughts: "In the div example - the code in place for presentational hooks are rather meaningless. A div is the Tupperware of the html world. Effectively it is a container to hold content." >> In your case, the extremes argue "no tables, period" vs "tables within >>tables within tables". I don't agree with either position - I think tables should be used when displaying tabular data, but definitely not overused as is the case when using tables for presentation. I can see the position that views a gallery page as tabular data, however I can't see how there's justification for using tables when they create more code weight than lists, and don't really show the association between the picture and the description/link/information/etc. the same way lists (whether ordered, unordered or definition) do. Thanks, Collin Davis - ACE, MCP Web Architect Stromberg Architectural Products p 903.454.0904 f 903.454.3642 e [EMAIL PROTECTED] web www.strombergarchitectural.com ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
