-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Stanton Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 9:20 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [WSG] Is sending abusive spam doing standards good or harm?
Hi All The WSG "Core" group are with you guys 100% here. No foul language, abuse, negativity or other offensive behaviour will be tolerated on the list. We do our best to keep an eye on things and deal with in appropriate behaviour by contacting those concerned directly. If you have any specific concerns please forward them to [email protected] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Just one other thing I like to point out - the page in question has been online for a lot longer than the WSG list and, to the best of my knowledge, it was not written by a list member. However posting the link to the list was probably not the best idea. -- Mark Stanton Gruden Pty Ltd http://www.gruden.com ****************************************************** If you look at night owl's home page, you'll find that this is intended as a "vent my spleen" page. If you take it in that spirit (and who amongst us hasn't caste this particular stone?), it remains a precise, accurate dissection of the problems with page design and construction. And, as she says she's never identified any particular page as moronic. Rather, she's describing an obtuse mind set which fails to understand the potential of the web. Personally, I hope she finds time to write the Windows rant. drew ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
