Ted Drake wrote:
I know it is a bad thing to spam your keywords. But if we need to do it to be competitive,
Sorry if I sound flippant, but if the business' competitiveness can only be maintained by spamming, then I'd say there's a fundamental business problem there.
> would this at least protect those that are innocent, the people who need to use screenreaders?
You can't, as a rule, say that screenreaders will not read out display:none'd page elements. I have an older version of JAWS at work (4.02), and that quite happily reads out the css-hidden things. So, don't rely on this...
-- Patrick H. Lauke _____________________________________________________ re�dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com
****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
