No, Stephen, a standards-compliant site does not mean an accessible site --
but it goes a long way towards it. Accessibility has it own set of
recommendations which sit atop those of pure compliant build, although
building to standards often illustrates the developer's mindset: doing the
job right :o)

Cheers,

Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stevio
> Sent: 26 February 2005 14:00
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [WSG] To display or not to display validation logos?
>
>
> Has anyone written anything like this we could use?
>
> Also, excuse my slight ignorance here, but just because a page
> validates as
> XHTML and CSS compatible, does that make it accessible?
>
> Obviously it helps, but there is more to accessibility than that isn't
> there. I also use tables in my pages in a couple of places, for the main
> navigation links and for the 2 column layout of the main content area.
>
> Thanks,
> Stephen

******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************

Reply via email to