On 8 Mar 2005, at 11:12 AM, Darren Wood wrote:
I use the following bit of code that seems to validate fine (also - lightweight):
<script type="text/javascript"> <!-- emailE=('darr' + 'en' + '@' + 'webd' + 'eveloper.co.nz') document.write('<a href="mailto:' + emailE + '">' + emailE + '</a>') //--> </script>
HTH D
These and the other 'simple' javascript methods posted are *really* easily decoded bt spammers. Remember, they're programmers, too...
An extra level of protection can be gained by importing the javascript from an external, linked .js file.
Personally, I use the Enkoder at <http://automaticlabs.com/products/enkoderform/>. AFAIK, its output validates (just to keep this post on-topic...).
N __________________________ Omnivision. Websight. http://www.omnivision.com.au/
****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
